1. API and Developer Experience

Corefy offers a mature, RESTful API with comprehensive documentation, SDKs, webhook support, and real-time status pages. Their developer portal includes tools for testing and exploring the full potential of their orchestration capabilities, making integration seamless for tech teams.

PayStar, though more discreet publicly, also provides a REST API with JWT-based authorization, IP whitelisting, and webhook mechanisms. Their API is tailored for speed and ease of integration. Notably, PayStar emphasizes rapid onboarding: new PSPs can be integrated within an average of 4 business days, making it highly attractive for fast-moving gambling operators.

Verdict: Corefy shines in developer transparency and community tools, but PayStar stands out with onboarding velocity and practical deployment flexibility.

2. Functionality: Routing, Cascading, and Beyond

Both platforms provide dynamic payment routing based on rule engines. Corefy enables infinite routing schemes via its visual editor, using parameters like transaction type, region, currency, or PSP status. A/B testing and machine learning-based optimization are supported.

PayStar offers equally robust routing with a visual scheme editor, support for multi-currency/method flows, fallback triggers, and traffic allocation presets. Their cascading engine ensures payment success even in case of upstream PSP failures, reportedly increasing transaction success rates by up to 15%.

White-label support is native in both platforms, with branded merchant portals and hosted payment pages. Additionally, both provide advanced analytics, real-time monitoring, and merchant management dashboards

Verdict: Feature parity is high. PayStar’s fallback strategy and speed of custom integrations give it a strong edge for high-velocity gaming environments.

3. Licensing and Platform Access

Both platforms operate under a SaaS model, offering limited, revocable, non-transferable licenses. Users get access to the software via cloud infrastructure. Corefy restricts sublicensing and reselling, as does PayStar.

PayStar also enforces strict usage terms but gives added flexibility through its white-label framework, appealing to operators who wish to fully brand their infrastructure.

Verdict: Licensing models are virtually identical. PayStar benefits from tailored white-label experiences for brands that require strong customer-facing control.

4. Pricing: Transparent and Scalable

Although not publicly disclosed on PayStar’s website, their pricing is effectively aligned with Corefy’s structure:

• Setup Fee: €1,000 (includes initial integrations)
• Monthly Fee: Starting at €1,000 with a scale up to €2,000 based on usage
• Transaction Fee: €0.05 per successful transaction
• On-demand Integrations: €1,000 per provider, €1,200 for custom HPPs

This pricing model supports businesses of all sizes, particularly high-volume gaming operators who benefit from predictable fixed costs and granular control of transaction flows.

Verdict: Both platforms offer transparent, fair pricing. PayStar matches Corefy in cost-effectiveness and adds value through faster deployment and integration timelines.

5. Security and Compliance

Both Corefy and PayStar are PCI DSS Level 1 certified, support 3D Secure 1 & 2, and employ TLS encryption across all data exchanges. Corefy is additionally ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified and registered with Visa/Mastercard as a third-party agent.

PayStar, while less vocal about third-party certifications, offers strong technical security features such as tokenization, two-factor authentication, and strict API key handling policies. Their system is monitored 24/7, with proactive anomaly detection and DDoS protection.

Verdict: Both platforms provide enterprise-grade security. Corefy leads in formal certifications; PayStar counters with operational agility and hands-on support tailored to iGaming.

Final Thoughts

For iGaming operators, choosing between Corefy and PayStar depends on your specific priorities:

• Choose Corefy for developer-centric tools, mature orchestration, and a battle-tested compliance framework.
• Choose PayStar for rapid integration, white-label branding, and flexibility in fast-scaling gambling environments.

Ultimately, both platforms empower operators to increase successful payment rates, reduce processing costs, and scale globally with confidence.